grouse.livejournal.comУважаемые знатоки. Не сочтите за труд оценить, насколько хороша оказалась редактура текста ( учитывая то, что нет пределов совершенству). Если можно, укажите на явные косяки. Нутром чую, что они есть. Заранее спасибо.
Было так:
The article investigates historical writing of Post-Soviet Kazakhstan in the proces of construction of the independent state. The author suggests that the outcome of the break up of the USSR forced Historians of Kazakhstan to reasses the National History and its relationship to the Russian imperial State and to the Soviet legasy. The contemporary historiography of Kazakhstan criticizes the Russian and the Soviet mainstream historiography for ignoring facts of the National History. But at the same time elaboration of new standards of historical writing is accompanied by creation of new stereotypes and myths (Russian colonialism). The author concludes that although Kazakhstan's historical writing is informed by politics and the goals of nation-building it can provide valuable isigns about the National History.
Стало так:
The article looks into the historical writings of Post-Soviet Kazakhstan in the process of the construction of the independent state. The author suggests that the collapse of the USSR forced Kazakhstan’s historians to reassess the national history and its attitude toward the legacy of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. Contemporary Kazakh historical writings criticize Russian and Soviet mainstream historiography for ignoring some certain facts of the national history. At the same time, elaboration of new standards of historical writing is accompanied by creation of new stereotypes and myths (for instance the so-called "Russian colonialism"). The author concludes that although Kazakhstan's historical writings are influenced by the political agenda of nation building, these writings can provide valuable insights into national history.